This WAS an OFFICIAL site for Hollie GREIG

THESE ARE THE SIMPLE FACTS OF THE HOLLIE GREIG CASE:



WHEN DOWNS SYNDROME GIRL HOLLIE GREIG ALLEGED THAT SHE HAD BEEN ABUSED BY A PAEDOPHILE GANG IN ABERDEEN, GRAMPIAN POLICE DID NOT CONDUCT ANY INVESTIGATION WORTHY OF THE NAME.



INSTEAD THEY INITIATED THE SECTIONING OF HER MOTHER ANNE, WHO HAS NEVER HAD ANY HISTORY OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS.



HOLLIE CLAIMED COMPENSATION FROM THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AUTHORITY WHO OBTAINED EVIDENCE FROM 2 SEPARATE PSYCHOLOGISTS.



HOLLIE WAS AWARDED £13,500 FROM THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AUTHORITY IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT NO-ONE HAS EVER BEEN CHARGED WITH ANY CRIME.

ROY GRIEG DIED EITHER BY AN UNHEARD OFF IN THE UK CATALYST FIRE IN A RAINY FIELD OR COMMITTED SUICIDE IN THE MOST HORRIBLE FASHION BY SETTING FIRE TO HIMSELF AGAIN UNHEARD OF IN THE UK OR HE WAS MURDERED
,SO 2 IMPROBABLES AGAINST A LIKELY




Monday, 16 January 2012

THE NEWS FROM STONEHAVEN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rIWgSEzThM

ROBERT GREEN’S TRIAL - DAY ONE

I’ve not long got off the phone from speaking with Robert. He is very up-beat but realistic as well. Here’s what can be reported about what happened in Open Court today…

After the usual formalities at the start, Robert was asked to confirm his name. He replied that he would be happy to do this after the presiding Sheriff and members of the prosecution team declared, under oath, that they are not ‘Accepted Freemasons’. This appeared to stump the Sheriff and, after some debate, most declared they were not. However, Sheriff Principal Edward Bowen, the one and only man presiding over Robert’s fate, ‘REFUSED’ to confirm or deny if he was an Accepted Freemason! It’s worth noting that there is no jury in this case. So, the only man not to answer Robert’s very reasonable question (given that Freemason’s have been seen in court previously passing documents between each other) was the man who holds Robert’s fate in his hands. This, naturally, means that any judgement passed against Robert will automatically be subject to appeal, if Robert chooses to.

The next interesting occurrence was when the prosecution was desperately trying to argue the Dame Elish Angiolini should not be called to answer questions in the dock. The reason given for this, by the prosecution was that Mrs Angiolini’s presence in this case was… IRRELEVANT! This declaration was met with howls of laughter from the public. It apparently took a few moments for the Court to regain some level of order before the case could continue. The Sheriff (Bowen) concluded that he would have to think about the application from the prosecution not to call Mrs Angiolini as a witness for cross-examination. Therefore, whilst the prosecution was no doubt hoping to nip that one in the bud today, Mrs Angiolini (the one who ordered Robert’s arrest in February 2010) is still on the hook and could be called to answer Robert’s questions in Open Court, under oath.

Finally, as the day was drawing to a close, Sheriff Bowen declared that he was aware that Robert’s legal defence team appeared to have a habit of bailing out on the second day. The Sheriff said that if this happened at any stage during this trial, Robert will have to represent himself. This was totally unacceptable to Robert as he has a legal right to proper legal representation under Scottish Law.

Robert is very aware of the ‘freeman on the land’ movement and ‘Common Law’. However, after very serious consideration, he feels that this matter is best addressed via the same system being used against him. As usual, Robert sends his deepest gratitude to EVERYONE who has helped and supported him, Anne and, of course, Hollie.
Posted by http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com at 18:51

1 comments:

  1. What a tragedy that Mr Green feels the need to play to an audience of fools by bringing up the issue of freemasonry. All this will achieve is to make him a figure of ridicule and distract attention from the gravely serious issues raised by this case.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)