GREG LANCE-WATKINS, DWARF AND A DIRTY SMELLY PERVERT !!
HUSBAND OF ENA SHARPLES
This WAS an OFFICIAL site for Hollie GREIG
THESE ARE THE SIMPLE FACTS OF THE HOLLIE GREIG CASE:
WHEN DOWNS SYNDROME GIRL HOLLIE GREIG ALLEGED THAT SHE HAD BEEN ABUSED BY A PAEDOPHILE GANG IN ABERDEEN, GRAMPIAN POLICE DID NOT CONDUCT ANY INVESTIGATION WORTHY OF THE NAME.
INSTEAD THEY INITIATED THE SECTIONING OF HER MOTHER ANNE, WHO HAS NEVER HAD ANY HISTORY OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS.
HOLLIE CLAIMED COMPENSATION FROM THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AUTHORITY WHO OBTAINED EVIDENCE FROM 2 SEPARATE PSYCHOLOGISTS.
HOLLIE WAS AWARDED £13,500 FROM THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AUTHORITY IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT NO-ONE HAS EVER BEEN CHARGED WITH ANY CRIME.
ROY GRIEG DIED EITHER BY AN UNHEARD OFF IN THE UK CATALYST FIRE IN A RAINY FIELD OR COMMITTED SUICIDE IN THE MOST HORRIBLE FASHION BY SETTING FIRE TO HIMSELF AGAIN UNHEARD OF IN THE UK OR HE WAS MURDERED
Health Professionals Council Park House 184 Kennington Park Road London SE11 4BU
27th November 2009
Dear Sirs,
PROFESSOR JAMES FURNELL
I am an investigator, dealing with a range of cases, mainly in England and Wales.
There are just two cases I am involved in, based in Scotland, which in almost every aspect are totally unrelated. However, there is one common denominator, the existence of which I find extremely disturbing. In each of the cases, Professor Furnell has prepared statements to the Court, supporting known violent and dangerous men against their victims.
In the case which I shall highlight, Professor Furnell actively supported the claims of a notorious paedophile rapist, Denis Charles Mackie against the mother, Anne Greig and her daughter Hollie, who has Down`s Syndrome, the latter being a victim of systematic rapes committed by Mackie and fifteen others over a fourteen year period. Mackie is Hollie`s father and the matter, which is being widely covered by the media, is currently in the hands of Grampian Police. Anne was also the victim of extreme violence perpetrated by Mackie.
This is to provide a background and on behalf of my clients, Anne and Hollie Greig, I wish to make a formal complaint about the conduct of Professor Furnell.
I enclose copies of the personal assessment made about Hollie by Dr Eva Harding and the statement by Professor Furnell, in which he clearly attempts to discredit a fellow specialist over an examination in which he had neither seen nor even spoken to the victim, Hollie Mackie, as she was known then. The written comments on Professor Furnell`s statements were made by my client. Furthermore, my clients were not provided with a copy of this statement during proceedings and it was only later that it came into their hands. One can only guess at the professor`s motives for writing this, but it seems to me both vindicative and unprofessional, as well as appearing to try to unreasonably influence the Court.
Therefore, I should be grateful if I may leave you to pursue this issue, in the public interest. In the other case, it would appear that Professor Furnell is adopting a similar method and stance, which must surely be a matter of concern.
I look forward to your response and please do not hesitate to phone me if there is anything you might wish to discuss.
Yours faithfully,
Robert Green Investigator and Lay Legal Representative for Hollie and Anne Greig
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
SK-H056 - GEORGE, T of SAI > FLEMING, Ian re POLICE 25-Nov-09
Reply to :
Scottish Government
Ian Fleming
Police Powers, Performance & Resources Division
Scottish Government 1W R St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG
Tel: 0131 244 2149
Fax: 0131 244 2666
Wednesday 25 November 2009
Dear Mr Fleming
Reply to Scottish Government re Hollie Greig sexual abuse rape gang scandal ...
Thank you for that very prompt acknowledgement and I look forward to a much fuller reply to my very serious concerns and criticisms re the handling of Hollie's appalling case by your Scottish Government "Justice" Department (and Ms Angiolini and her Scottish Crown Office of course) when you feel more able to do so.
Tom
cc.
Scots Against Injustice ScotsVInjustice@aol.com Edinburgh
07791-226-490
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
Mr Thomas M George ScotsVInjustice@aol.com ___
Your ref: Our ref: 2009/0035472OR 24 November 2009
Dear Mr George
I refer to your e-mail of 27 October to the Scottish Ministers in which you raise specific concerns about the case of Hollie Greig. I have been asked to reply.
However in doing so I feel there is nothing further that can usefully be added to the reply I sent you on 23 November in response to your correspondence with the Cabinet Secretaries for Justice and Education about this case, the contents of which will by now have been conveyed to you.
Yours faithfully
Vicky Wilson
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
Mr Thomas M George ScotsVInjustice@aol.com ___
Our ref: 2009/0033362OR 23 November 2009
Dear Mr George
I refer to your e-mails of 30 October and 1 November 2009 to the Cabinet Secretaries for Justice and Education respectively in which you raise specific concerns about the case of Hollie Greig. I am aware of your previous correspondence with Ian Fleming, from the Police and Community Safety Directorate in the Scottish Government and prior to that with the First Minister. I have been asked to reply.
You will of course appreciate that I cannot go into the specifics of any case or discuss the circumstances and grounds for any decisions taken either by the police or the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. Indeed the actions of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service are matters for the Lord Advocate, and the actions of the police are matters for the Chief Constable. The Chief Constable alone is responsible for police operations. Neither the First Minister nor Scottish Ministers have powers to direct Chief Constables on the enforcement of the law or the deployment of officers (although the Lord Advocate has powers to do so).
As you would expect public protection is a matter for the police. Agreed risk assessment procedures are in place to ensure the safety and wellbeing of any individual who is thought to be in a threatening situation. From all that you say Grampian Police is alert to the concerns you have raised and will no doubt use any intelligence gathered to inform their next steps, including any action necessary to prevent crime.
It is clear to me from the terms of your correspondence that you remain dissatisfied with the responses to your enquiries. Whilst such expressions of dissatisfaction are always a matter of concern, I hope you will find the foregoing information helpful.
Yours faithfully
Vicky Wilson
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
FAO: Scottish Cabinet / Government - and All Opposition Members of the Scottish Parliament ...
NEWS:
'Hollie tells police she was abused by sheriff'
Down’s syndrome victim identifies Sheriff & Police in Aberdeen Paedophile ring as Grampian Police investigate claims of historical abuse
‘The Firm’ censored, now apologise over Lord Advocate 'allegations' in Hollie Greig abuse scandal as Police investigate Aberdeen Paedophile ring
>StolenKids-Hollie< OR >Hollie Anne Greig< - Google Search __________________________________________________________________________NEWS:
Tuesday 17 November 2009
Exclusive: Angiolini challenged over paedophile ring activity involving serving SheriffThe mother of Hollie Greig, a Downs syndrome girl at the centre of an alleged paedophile abuse ring, has called for an investigation into the role played by Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini almost ten years ago, when Angiolini served as a district Procurator Fiscal.
A serving Sheriff who is still in post and a now deceased police officer have been named as part of the girl’s ring of abusers.
Anne Greig told the Firm that she believed the investigation has been effectively blocked.“This needs to come out to get some serious protection for my daughter and other people with disabilities. This is just appalling,” she said.
The claims were made to an audience of 400 people at the Alternative View conference held at Bristol’s Thistle Grand Hotel this weekend, attended by campaigners and by Hollie Greig together with her mother Anne, who told The Firm she was concerned that her daughter’s abuse had been covered up.
Campaigners for the family have challenged the Lord Advocate to explain what she knew about the ring in 2000 when the matter was brought to the attention of Grampian police.
Overall responsibility to prosecute rests with the Regional Procurator Fiscal of a particular jurisdiction.
Angiolini was appointed as Regional Procurator Fiscal at Aberdeen during July 2000.
Hollie Greig and her mother state that they gave a statement in person at Aberdeen’s Bucksburn Police Station naming her abusers on 25th August 2000.
The Crown Office said that Angiolini’s appointment came “after the decision in this case was taken” and stated that there is no information to suggest that she had any involvement in the case at any time. However The Firm has seen correspondence addressed directly to Angiolini dated 27 October 2000 from MSP Brian Adam asking her what progress she had made with the case at that time.
Mr Adam said in August he now “no longer holds any records relating to those enquiries,” and the current Area Procurator Fiscal for Aberdeen Anne Currie said the Crown Office did “not have a letter on file of response by the then Regional Fiscal, Mrs Angiolini to Brian Adam MSP.”
No explanation is provided for the absence of the correspondence.
No charges were ever brought, although in April this year Greig received a payout of £13,500 from the criminal injuries compensation authority, and was described by Detective Inspector Iain Allen of Grampian Police as “a truthful witness to the best of her ability and an entirely innocent victim.”
Campaigners have now challenged Angiolini to explain what she knew in 2000 and “precisely when in the year 2000” she was made aware of this case. They have also asked her to clarify if she was a “close friend” of the named Sheriff at the time the matter was originally under investigation.
The family have since moved to Shropshire, and Grampian police reinterviewed Hollie Greig there in September this year. Anne Greig, Hollie’s mother, has yet to hear whether charges will be brought against the individuals named as being part of the alleged ring of abuse, which includes former serving police officers and members of social service care, banking professionals and the fire service, as well as a currently serving Sheriff and their family members.
“What has happened to Hollie is appalling, but what is still happening at this time is more appalling. These people are still at large,” she said.
The Lord Advocate declined to comment.
A Crown Office communications manager told The Firm that Angiolini “was not the Regional Procurator Fiscal when this decision was made,” but added that they had yet to check when a decision was taken not to prosecute, by whom and on what grounds.______________________________________________________________
Scots Against InjusticeInvestigators
Edinburgh
07791-226-490
ScotsVInjustice@aol.com(With no political party affiliations and in the interests of the truth and justice for all our Scottish citizens).
Hi,
Sadly as Time has progressed and more and more evidence has come to light the dirth of evidence substantiating the 'STORIES' surrounding Hollie Greig has become ever more evident.
It is my personal opinion that, having studied this subject for over 18 months and read every item I have been able to obtain - There seems to be absolutely NO admissible valid evidence substantiating the sexual abuse of Hollie Greig who we now learn is not only a Down's Syndrome patient but has a mental age assessed at around 3.1/2.
It would seem the 'STORIES' are the fabrication of her mother in some disturbed state, similar to Munchausen Disease by Proxy & a cross between anger and vengeance.
There is also NO evidence that her Brother Roy died by any means other than suicide whilst very drunk.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
PS these facts are unlikely to prevent the sick minded who can not admit they were duped admitting same and beware anyone who tries to stop their delluded band wagon is likely to be attacked for stating their opinion based upon FACTS.
G.L-W.
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name!
This is the text as presented by Mr. Robert Green in public at The Quaker Hall in Edinburgh early in October Hosted by the campaign group, Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers Robert Green is Acting as: an Ivestigator and Lay Representative To: Mrs. Anne Greig & her daughter Hollie Greig.
You can view each page of Robert Green's notes for this presentation rather better if you double click the page which will open in a different window - if it is still too small you may find an enlarge facility helpfull.
We will, when time permits, return and type up the document directly on this blog.
THE SHOCKING STORY OF HOLLIE GREIG:
sheet 01
sheet 02
sheet 03
sheet 04
ABERDEEN PAEDOPHILE RAPE RING
sheet 05
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
this letter was supplied to me by Greg MacKIE on 09-Jun-2010 with a view to my publishing it on this blog I understand.
I have been asked to redact certain information, which I have.
I have posted it on the day of its arrival though not at the time of its arrival and have posted an identical copy numbered SK-H250 on 20-Nov-2009 to feature in time context.
I have posted it in the position prior to postings made subsequently as I wish it to be taken seriously in context.
I have every reason to believe the claims made by both Father and Son are true and can be substantiated.
I have been aware of grave anomalies in this story sice around October 2009 and was always very wary from the start as many things did not ring true. Thus the material I published was only that which had already been published or publicised elsewhere first.
I made a mistake, acting in good faith, in publishing some of the material but I like many subsequently was duped by the convincing nature of the lies. Also I could see no motive for such a widespread dishonesty.
I again post in good faith and call on you to make your own judgement.
XXREDACTEDXX
From: gregthemackie@XXREDACTEDXX
To: alex.salmond.msp@XXREDACTEDXX; firstminister@XXREDACTEDXX; kenny.macaskill.msp@XXREDACTEDXX
re Letters concerning Hollie Greig from Thomas M. George to Alec Salmond and published, publicly on the internet and dated Saturday 24 October 2009.
May I make myself clear from the beginning, I am writing to you peacefully, giving you a notice of understanding.
Whereas, leaders of Scottish Representative Government and responsible to the people of Scotland in regard to human rights and the protection of these rights and the common law, and, as living, breathing, human beings, as defined by article one of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood."
Whereas, the head of the of the devolved Scottish government, a legal corporation, responsible for the implementation of the Human rights Act 1988, The Scotland Act 1998, The European Convention on Human Rights and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Whereas, the Cabinet Secretary in Scotland with responsibilities including Criminal law and procedure, police, legal aid, human rights, vulnerable witnesses, victim support.
I speak to you humbly as a concerned brother of Hollie Marie Mackie (Hollie Greig) and son of Anne Elizabeth Greig (formerly Anne Elizabeth Mackie). Furthermore, I speak on behalf of, and, with the lawful authority of Denis Charles Mackie, father of Hollie Marie Mackie and ex-husband of Anne Elizabeth Greig.
Understand, We are writing to you because it has come to our attention through newspaper publications and a defamatory blog\website on the internet, that you have been contacted directly in regard to Hollie Marie Mackie, a Down´s Syndrome adult born 23rd of November 1979 in Aberdeen (Hollie Greig), because this information has been made public knowledge, and therefore, it is our duty to write to you and it is with a very heavy heart.
The irresponsible and offending blog\website related to Hollie Marie Mackie can be found here http://stolenkids-hollie.blogspot.com. Most of the documentation which has enlightened us can be found there. This particular blog is part of a blog\website for stolen children but this particular blog is degrading to Hollie Marie Mackie. The blog was created by a username called Hollie. Stories from this blog\website are being carried by other sites.
The national newspaper “The News of the World”, the regional Aberdeen newspaper “The Press and Journal” and the regional Shropshire newspaper “The Shropshire Star” have printed articles on this matter.
In Aberdeen nine and a half years ago my mother Anne Greig believed irrationally there was a conspiracy involving money, and, was erroneously convinced my father was cheating on her with her own cousin. One night she pushed herself into a terrible mental state and ran away from our family home in her bare feet and in her pyjamas. She never ever came back to the family. At a later date she removed my sister, Hollie Marie Mackie, all the valuable possessions, and "all" of our families paperwork and photos.
My mother also took all of my father´s personal belongings which came from his family. It is clear the police at the time of this incident did not believe these conspiracies. My mother and her agents have now documented online a side to the story that we have never known. It is clear my mother was sectioned. It is clear we were denied our family rights. It is clear my mother suffers paranoia. It is clear my mother still believes in the same conspiracies. It is clear we were denied fundamental rights during this process.
It is clear my mother should never have been in a position to be responible for Hollie Marie Mackie and be able to continue her paranoia and conspiracies in public view. It is clear she has no capacity to ensure the dignity of my sister. It is clear she has no capacity to ensure the dignity of herself. It is clear my mother is continuing to act irresponsibly, specifically, she is being allowed to publically degrade my sister in servitude, and, she is denying myself, my father and my sister our inalienable family rights.
My mother with the full help and support of the state corporations has consistently shown she believes she is above the law.
Nine years ago my mother turned on eveyone in her life and ran away from everything. My father, who has financially supported his family since Hollie Marie Mackies birth, has been left without the ability to retire due to this situation. During the divorce proceedings my mother used the services of over seven known and different lawyers, and the family home in Scotland was sold at a huge loss.
Due to my mothers inability to keep one lawyer, my father, had to spend much more than is normal and reasonable to get divorced from my mother. I believe my mother was on state funded legal aid during this whole time. My father has never again seen his daughter. My mother distrusts police, doctors, lawyers, the government, her family and her friends. She continually says everyone is conspiring against her.
You must now be aware my mother and her agents have made it public knowledge they are accusing an Aberdeen Sheriff, the Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini, the BBC, the News of the World.... and many others in a non existent world of corruption and conspiracy. My mother has since moved to England and is still irrational, paranoid and proving herself irresponsible. This has to stop.
This is state sponsored paranoia and a witchhunt. The press are currently investigating her unlawful story and they are contacting the people involved. I can speak for everyone on the list when I say nobody wants this public. This is a genuine family tragedy.
Today it can be shown the authorities denied our inalienable convention rights and the effect of this is still being suffered by our family. We were denied the right to our family and we lost our family.
Today it can be shown the authorities failed to protect my mother nine years ago and entirely failed to protect my sister at the time and during the last nine years.
Today it can be shown my sister is in servitude to the will of my mother and a Mr Green (an investigator hired by 3rd parties, in his own words). My mother is not capable of providing dignity of person for herself or for my sister.
I ask you, where does that leave my mother and my sister nearly ten years later? Where does it leave the family. Is it finally time for the authorities to stop this nightmare and fix the wrongs allowed to happen.
It has come to our attention from the internet (site above) that Grampian Police have unlawfully reinterviewed Hollie Marie Mackie in October 2009 in England. May it be noted Denis Charles Mackie was never contacted when his only daughter, Hollie a handicapped adult, was reinterviewed for over three and a half hours in Shropshire, England by Grampian Police. My mother is not the sole legal guardian of Hollie Marie Mackie but denies Denis Charles Mackie all access to his daughter.
My father was married when Hollie was born so he has equal rights and responsibilities towards his daughter as Anne Elizabeth Greig in law. Consent for this interview only came from my mother, so can she prove responsibility and capacity to maintain my sisters dignity before, during and after this interview took place?
It has come to our attention from the internet that an unknown person Mr Robert Green has made it public knowledge he is a “Lay Legal Representative of Anne and Hollie Greig” and he was present during this police interview when it is reported Hollie Marie Mackie, a Down´s Syndrome adult spoke about degrading sexual acts for over three hours.
It has come to our attention, by means of public printed journals in Aberdeen my mother is claiming Grampian Police are quoted as saying Hollie Marie Mackie is a credible witness.
Is it true Grampian Police claim my Downs Syndrome sister, Hollie Marie Mackie is a credible witness capable of a sworn testimony? I am not a lawyer nor a specialist in Mental Health but I do believe if my sister does not comprehend the legal process then she has a clear right to be protected and there is a duty to protect her. “Her right” is her legal guardians and the states duty to protect her.
Can it be shown unequivocally Hollie Marie Mackie, a Down´s Syndrome adult did this alone, voluntarily, with sound reason and conscience and with the ability and capacity to uphold her own dignity?
In other words did Hollie do what she wanted to do of her own free will or did she do what Anne Elizabeth Greig and Mr Robert Green wanted her to do? If Hollie Marie Mackie is not capable of reason and conscience, it is not her fault, and she should therefore be protected by the law and within the law.
Did she sign any official documentation during this unlawful, sexually explicit, degrading event in front of Robert Green? Did she sign a testimony? Is Hollie legally of mental capacity to enter contracts and sign testimonies and therefore be a credible witness in the eyes of the law?
And I ask, was Hollie manipulated into presenting the police with a false story?
It has come to our attention that the government, and other corporations of the state have been sent a list which has our names on it and a number of other names, which clearly state "rape gang" and "victims". May it be noted, Hollie Marie Mackie is one of the victims of this list.
May it be noted there are other victims on this list.
These allegations have been investigated by Grampian Police, and they cleared all the charges, and, I am aware it is unlawful to be investigated twice for the same offence “without” new evidence. So, can you please clarify the position of the state and the Grampian Police for this serious allegations being investigated again by the Government and by Grampian Police?
This can be shown from published newspapers, and, from letters publically available on the internet showing the government are in formal communications with 3rd parties in regard to this unlawful matter. The people responsible for this list must be held fully liable and accountable, this is unlawful.
It has come to our attention that the aforementioned list continues to be made public, and allegedly, a Scottish member of the Westminster Parliament, attended a public meeting in England where this list was first made public. This list is not lawful and bears no legal authority in Scotland or England.
This list is included presumably in the origional investigation notes by the police and therefore it has been proven totally false or at least not credible by the Grampian Police, and, given the fact these are such horrible, degrading, sexual allegations involving a handicapped person, it may be assumed it was fully investigated and that is why there was no prosecution.
Furthermore the people on that list are the people who love and care for Anne Elizabeth Greig and Hollie Marie Mackie. Close family, Anne´s cousin, Anne´s closest friends and their families, Hollie´s family, my father´s brother and sister and their individual families, my father´s cousin and her family, my sister´s carer and her family, and a sheriff officer who I may add, nobody we know knows.
The only people not on the list are my mother and her side of the family.
There is no truth whatsoever to her story, and this has been accepted by the authorities who previously investigated these allegations.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter sent to Sheriff Buchanan from Robert Green with a list of names on it.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from David R. Arthur, Acting Sheriff Clerk, Scottish Court Services, Aberdeen on official headed paper to Robert Green in June 2009. In this letter Sheriff Buchanan states to Mr Green “the names on the letter mean absolutely nothing to him and he has no idea what this is about”.
It has come to our attention for the first time, details of story which Anne Elizabeth Greig has invented, and, the unlawful way the state corporations have kept this information secret from the family and continue to keep it secret. As her nearest family we were denied our convention rights.
It has come to our attention that the state participates and continues to allow Anne Greig to be unlawful and can be held responsible for her actions over the last ten years.
Why is no-one protecting my sister from this woman? Why is no-one protecting my mother from herself? This situation was first reported to the authorities over nine years ago and it is still here the same as before, except now Anne Greig is abusing her own daughter Hollie Marie Mackie. Why is it that nearly ten years later we finally hear about our family publicly and from 3rd party sources???
It has come to our attention some details about my mother being forcibly sectioned. It has come to our attention the state did not contact the nearest relative when this occurred as is the protocol. Neither for my mother, nor for my sister, who presumably went into state care at the same time.
A double failure followed by mothers release has permitted her to abuse my sister and continue this state funded paranoia for the next nine years. My father was married to my mother at the time and Hollie Marie Mackie is his, flesh and blood daughter. We would like these two unlawful and very important failings explained?
It has come to our attention my mother has been allowed to make certain private medical documents public. Anne Greig has made public letters of the most private nature about my Hollie Marie Mackie, from Hollie´s school doctor to the family doctor, and, she has made public her own reports, letters and documentation from when she was sectioned by the authorities nine years ago.
Does my mother have the conscience of mind to realize that this is degrading to my sister, and, to herself? Is my mother proving incapacity to maintain dignity for my sister as defined by the Mental Health Act with this action? Is the Lay Legal Representative Mr. Green, who was present and a witness to Hollie Marie Mackie´s interview with the police acting with due care and responsibility, and, capable of upholding everyone´s dignity when he put all this information on the internet?
The people who allow my mother to publish private medical records must be held liable and fully accountable. The Chesire Investigator Mr Green and the website he uses must be held accountable for declaring that he will expose the inocent paedophile ring because what he is doing is unlawful. The same goes for Thomas M. George who is acting unlawfully and engaging with the current governmental authorities in equally unlawful conduct.
It has come to our attention on the internet a text presented by Mr Green at the Quaker Hall in Edinburgh on 3rd October but posted online on the 21st November 2009. In this text it states my mother accused the police of “drugging” my sister Hollie Marie Mackie nine years ago.
It also states in my mothers words that the police called Hollie a liar. Why was my father never informed of these accusations regarding his handicapped daughter and his wife?
As my mothers only son why was I not contacted? There is a clear duty of protection towards Hollie. If my mother was sectioned there is a clear duty of responsibility to her future mental health and her family. There was and still is a duty to the family.
It has come to our attention Anne Greig has claimed nine years ago she was being drugged by her husband Denis Charles Mackie and she claimed these drugs came from her own cousin Carol Low.
It has come to our attention Anne Greig claimed she was being drugged whilst in a hostel when she first ran away from the family home.
It has come to our attention through the internet “through her legal agent”, my mother and Mr Green claim my father killed my uncle Robert David Greig.
It has come to our attention on the internet a copy of the late Robert David Greig´s death certificate has been made public.
It has come to our attention a story written by Robert Green and posted publically on the blog called “The shocking Story of Hollie Greig”. This is libelous defamation. It names the Lord Advocate amongst others.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Brian Adam MSP on Scottish Parliament headed paper to Mrs Angiolini on behalf of my mother, the Procurator Fiscal in Aberdeen in October of 2000.
On the digital reproduction it can be clearly seen in my mothers handwriting the word “corrupt” written with other words on the origional copy.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Catherine Mason, Senior Social Worker on Aberdeen City Council official headed paper to Dinis Dinsmore of the Advocacy service in October of 2003. It can be clearly seen in my mothers handwriting “I WAS CLEARLY SECTIONED FOR REPORTING MY DAUGHTERS ABUSE” and “PAPER CHASE TO DISCREDIT ME” written on the origional.
It has come to our attention on the internet a defamatory letter sent by Mr Green to Mr Salmond dated 20 June 2009. I am aware you must know about this letter so if I may just quote one sentence from Mr Green “The question must surely be, who at the BBC would want to go to such lengths to suppress an issue of clear national importance – and why?”
It has come to our attention on the internet the official reply from the Head of Victims and Diversity of the Scottish Government. It is clearly stated “I can advise you that the circumstances of this case are currently under investigation by Grampian Police.”
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Mr Robert Green to Mr McIntyre, Head of Victims policy division, Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, and also sent to the First Minister.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Catherine Mason, Senior Social Worker on Aberdeen City Council to Neighbourhood Services (North), Social Work, Exchequer House, Aberdeen also in October 2003.
This letter mentions a warrant under section 117 Mental Health (Scotland) that was not executed because the Mental Health Officer was given the wrong address.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Fiona Palin, Neighbourhood Services (North) to Ms Dinsmore, Advocay Service in December 2003.
It can be clearly seen “The decision to apply for a warrant based on concerns around Mrs Mackie´s allegations that Hollie had been sexually abused by her estranged husband and that this abuse involved other family members, friends and professionals”, “Mrs Mackie ran away from the police”, “Mrs Mackie shouted... ...that the Police were not the real Police.
She was calling on passers-by to telephone the real police.” and finally “Dr Palin felt that Mrs Mackie was mentally ill but that he could not detain her in hospital for a further period. Dr Palin would have preferred Mrs Mackie to remain in hospital.”
It has come to our attention through the publicly available newspaper “The Press and Journal”, my mother is claiming the Aberdeen born pop star Annie Lennox is supporting her.
It has come to our attention Anne Greig can be quoted in the printed public press as saying that she went to the police authorities in England when Madeleine McCann went missing to give them our names because we live in Portugal. Is this publicly published private opinion lawful and non discriminatory?
Does Anne Greig have a right to publish in the press an unproven unlawful descriminatory private opinion? I specifically ask is she being responsible and not infringing the inalienable rights of others?
It has come to our attention on the internet an update dated 10th August and 03 October 2009 marked SK-H009.
“In August 2009, after more pressure was being exerted on the paedophile gang, a shot was fired, at head height, at the window of Anne and Hollie´s home.
Grampian Police, who had been characreristically tardy in pursuing the rape case, as well as Alex Salmond´s office, were informed that I would hold the individuals involved in the delay personally responsible if any harm were to befall Anne and\or Hollie.
Grampian Police immediately arranged to send two officers, Tanya Leiper and Lisa Evans, from Aberdeen to Shrewsbury to interview Anne and Hollie on 8th September.
I was able to listen to Hollies interview with Lisa Evans. It took almost three and a half hours of the most harrowing type imaginable, where Hollie had ro relive her multiple and systematic rape ordeals. Most of which took place at the home of Sheriff Buchanan´s sister, Evelyn Buchanan.
It should also be borne in mind that this is the third time Hollie had been through this type of interview with the police, who have accepted that Hollie is a truthful witness.
In late September, Grampian Police were refusing to provide a crime number and according to the police at Shrewsbury, no record of the interview existed, even though three West Mercia officers were present. The refusal extended to the Chief Constable´s office, where Fiona Topping refused to cooperate in any way. Fortunately, a helpful journalist asked Grampian the same question, leading to a D.I. Dowall providing this most simple and basic information.
Naturally this led to the suspicion that another conspiracy to cover up, similar to that of 2000, was being planned, so I called a public meeting, held in Edinburgh on 3rd October 2009, in order to name all members of the rape gang, their known victims and those who had conspired to pervert the course of justice, including the Lord Advocate, Elish Angiolini. Also named were the BBC team, when they were forced by an unnamed senior member of the corpoation to abandon investigations into paedophile rings operating in Scotland.
All those I criticised for trying to block an investigation were invited to the meeting to give them a public opportunity to defend themselves and their actions, but none took this offer up.
The BBC continue to evade naming the individual who blocked and threatened it´s investigative team. Clearly, if the BBC really believed it was acting correctly, there would be no need for this person´s identity to be withheld.”
It has come to our attention from the Shropshire Star printed on the 2nd of October that Mr Green made it public knowledge that he was going to expose the entirely innocent alleged paedophile ring.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Mr Green to Mark Thomson, Director General of the BBC on the 2nd October 2009.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Mr Green to Anne B. Currie, Area Procurator Fiscal, Aberdeen on 5th October 2009. It says Sheriff Buchanan should resign.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Mr Green to Alex Salmond on the 5th of October 2009. In this letter Mr Green admits he made the public unlawful speech in Edinburgh naming and slandering the inocent gang.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Mr Green to Chief Constable McKerracher, Grampian Police HQ on 6th October and a copy was sent to Alex Salmond. Mr Green confesses to the Chief Constable his entirely unlawful slanderous actions and even sends the Chief Constable a written copy of his entire and libelous speech in Edinburgh.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Mr Green to the Lord Advocate on the 30th October. Mr Green state this is “surely the worst of its kind in Scottish history”. Mr Green asks the Lord Advocate if she is directly or indirectly involved in “the BBC scandal”, and, if she is responsible for the dismissal of the press officer of the Down´s Syndrome Association on the Monday before.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter by Theo Lansing, Special Correspondent. This letter continues the themes of paranoia and conspiracy, however, it contains what appears to be a direct quote from the BBC on their reasons for dropping the investigation “We would be unable to defend a libel action from anyone we accused of abuse... ...when such a wealth of material exists to suggest that one of our principal contributors suffered mental health problems at the time when these allegations were first made”.
It is also claimed an eminent expert Dr. Helen Smith pronounced Anne Greig “perfectly sane” shortly after release from hospital in 2000 and this forced a doctor, Dr Alaistair Palin, to retract his earlier diagnosis and agree that Anne Greig had no mental health problems at all.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Mr Green to Mr Brian Adam MSP on 5th of November 2009. It is mentioned by Mr Green that Hollie Marie Mackie will swear that her old Head Teacher a Mr Young “touched her” in his office at Beechwood School in Aberdeen. Beechwood School is a special school in Aberdeen for handicapped children. It is noted Mr Green states he is the Lay Legal representative to Anne and Hollie Greig.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Thomas M. George (et al), Scots Against Injustice to the Lord Advocate on 3rd November 2009. Mr George is enquiring about the case and Sheriff Buchanan.
It has come to our attention on the internet Mr Green claims he was hired by a group of Scottish lawyers against corruption... i.e. Scots Against Injustice and Mr Thomas M. George (et al).
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from Mr Green to Marcus Ryder of the BBC on 17th November 2009. “...Additionally, we have long suspected that at least one member of the BBC´s senior executives was involved in child sex crimes. This became more clear with the recent Martyn Smith affair. No wonder the BBC has no interest in protecting the most vulnerable members of society from sexual abuse...”.
It has come to our attention on the internet an article by Mr Green about a speech by Brian Gerrish, ex-Naval officer about Hollie at the Grand Hotel in Broad street Bristol, England. The article is written in the style of a journal or a diary from the beginning until the end of the day.
It can be quoted from this article “Clearly no truth in the rumour that the weather was a “conspiracy” organised by some secret agency of the Government headed by owls and lizards to prevent Hollies tale being told!” and “I also raised the issue and soundly criticised Salmond for failing to dismiss Elish Angiolini as his Lord Advocate, since we had clearly exposed her dishonesty to Salmond some months hence. Breaking new ground, at a videoed public meeting, I turned my attention to the various threats and worse against those who had tried to bring out the true facts in Hollie´s story.
These included: the likely murder of Robert Greig (Anne´s brother and thus Hollie´s uncle who we believe caught her Father in “delicto flagrante”, some 3 weeks earlier); the inexplicable collapse of the BBC´s firm commitment to the story on 10th June 2009; the recent dismissal of press officer John Smithies of The Down´s Syndrome Association,...”
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter called “Dramatis Personae”. A defamatory list by Mr Green. It prints our current and correct contact details.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter from John Logue, Head of Policy Division, Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service on headed paper to Mr Green on the 17th December 2009.
It ends with “As your concerns have now been addressed on several occasions, the Crown Office does not intend to correspond with you further on this issue unless you raise points which have not been previously addressed.”
It has come to our attention on the internet a story by “The Firm” on 18th November 2009, the Crown Office issued a statement containing “the decision not to raise prosecution proceedings against an alleged paedophile ring whilst she (the Lord Advocate) was an Area Procuratpr Fiscal”.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter by Mr Green posted on 18th November called “THE FINAL SOLUTION”. It claims Down´s Syndrome children were customarily drowned in Pennan Bay, Scotland, but that they admit no proof, no further details, only the existance of an alleged picture allegedly portraying this practice.
It has come to our attention on the internet a letter by Mr Thomas George to Mr Ian Fleming of the Police Powers, Performance and Resources Division, of the Scottish Government on the 24th November 2009. Mr George provides a link to the list of the innocent rape gang and continues the alleged involvement\conspiracy by the entirely innocent Lord Advocate.
Furthermore, to highlight the complete and utter failure by the authorities, my mother has been allowed to receive an award from official authorities in England worth £13,500 without there having ever been a crime!!! How is it possible that my mother is allowed to enslave my sister publically and degrade her in this way? Hollie Marie Mackie is a Down´s Syndrome adult being used as my mothers own personal human being, AND, she uses Hollie unlawfully and directly with equally unlawful state corporations.
Do the authorities in England really believe the Scottish Police drugged my sister as well? My mother claims she was sectioned illegally, did the authorities accept this over the official reasons supplied by Grampian Police?
My sister is mentally handicapped. She can never fully attain the definition of article one of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights already mentioned above, and I refer to “reason and conscience” and this person has the right to be protected. This treatment is degrading to my sister, privately and publically, and, it is effectively slavery\servitude.
Where is her dignity? Did this state corporation in England not contact the Grampian Police before making this unlawful award? Were they not aware this had been fully investigated? Were they not aware this award is therefore unlawful?
We have not seen Hollie Marie Mackie for over nine years and it was her thirtieth birthday last week on Monday 23rd of November. My sister spent all of her childhood talking about her twenty first birthday because she is aware that she is different, and, she longed for the day when she would finally be an adult, or, as adult as she is able to be. We missed that day just as we have missed every single day and birthday since. We used to be a very, very close family and it is a truly torturous pain we suffer, our rights were not protected when we needed them by people with a duty to us.
The authorities denied our rights and failed to protect my mother and sister, and are therefore responsible for Anne Elizabeth Greig being allowed to deny my sister her right to dignity, unlawfully and illegally, a dignity that we are all entitled to. I have no doubt in my mind my sister does what she does because she loves my mother, but she is a Down´s Syndrome adult and there is a duty to protect her from being manipulated.
Mental health I am aware is an emotive subject, but three people are being denied the right to their family because of the will of one and she has had the unlawful help and the full support of the state corporations and its mechanisms in Scotland and now in England.
There is a great deal of injustice surrounding all aspects of this story, but at the heart of it all, there is a family who do not deserve to be treated the way they have by no-one, by no person or by any state corporation. We miss Hollie Marie Mackie deeply and we know she misses us.
Whereas, it is my understanding that; all men are created equally under one Creator, and, to deny me my Right is in Breach of the Law, and those guilty will be fully liable and punishable within Common Law.
Whereas it is my understanding that equality before the law is paramount and mandatory and, furthermore I claim the right to lawfully exercise my "common law rights", unhindered, unencumbered. Furthermore, I claim that "Ignorance of the Law" is not a lawful or legal claim when used by the State, government, principals, employees, agents, and justice system participants at any and all levels to my harm or detriment, especially by those claiming limited liability.
I state that it is my duty to Claim such rights, to protect them, and I am aware that a claim of right by a responsible human being, lawfully outweighs the civic liberties of an irresponsible person or persons incapable of responsibility. Furthermore, it is our duty to inform of fundamental breaches in human rights, and even more so when the state corporations are complicit.
As two adult human beings who understand that with rights come responsibilities, we would like our rights to our family respected and protected. We would like our dignity to be protected and respected. We would like our privacy protected and respected.
We would like the rights of Hollie Marie Mackie and Anne Elizabeth Greig also to be equally protected and respected accordingly as they are also entitled.
We would like to reinform the respected gentlemen that this is a peaceful notice of understanding. Everyone involved in this has suffered enough and we would like it to end.
We are aware state corporations had no lawful authority to allow this situation to go on for ten years and we understand that state corporations cannot infringe or deny these inalienable rights.
We currently live in the family house in Portugal, which may I add, was bought before my mothers paranoia started, and, where our family had planned to live.
We live in a small village the type where everybody knows everybody, and we are aware that the village was been visited on at least one occasion by Britains enquiring about us and who paid the drinks for everybody in the local cafe\bar all night long. We are not fugitives, we are not criminals.
We would like to protect our common law rights which have been unlawfully, infringed and denied by various state corporations and we would like our own home-coming this year.
We respectfully and patiently await your reply to this notice. Please respond to this internet address.
Greg Charles Mackie Without Prejudice
Denis Charles Mackie Without Prejudice
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
To understand the Concept & Service of StolenKids- where you can help yourself and others at: StolenKids- GO TO http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.com/
SK-H036 - GREEN, R > LOGUE, J CROWN OFFICE 20-Nov-2009
REDACTED Appleton Warrington Cheshire WA4 5AR
REDACTED
Mr John Logue Head of Policy Crown Office 25 Chambers Street Edinburgh EH1 1LA
20th November 2009
Dear Mr Logue,
HOLLIE GREIG/ELISH ANGIOLINI
Your long-awaited letter of 17th November is unsatisfactory.
The real concerns have not been addressed and I find that much of the letter is constructively misleading, unintelligible and conclude that you are not acting in good faith.
However, I feel that I should educate you on certain facts and include my opinions, where appropriate.
To begin with, there have never been allegations against one person only. Any information that you have been provided with to the contrary is thus false. On 18th May 2000, Hollie Greig gave evidence that she had been sexually abused by both her father, Denis Charles Mackie and her brother Greg Mackie.
I understand that Mrs Angiolini became Procurator Fiscal in July 2000.
On the 25th August 2000, Hollie and Anne Greig again attended Bucksburn Police Station, where names of a further fourteen sexual attackers were named, including police officer Terry Major and Mrs Angiolini`s associate Sheriff Graeme Buchanan. Not only were these additional assailants named, but Hollie also disclosed the names of two other child victims of the ring, the children of social worker Helen Macdonald and her husband Ian.
Eleven days later, on 5th September 2000, a criminal abduction of Anne Greig took place, whereby she was falsely sectioned in what was a crude and brutal attempt to silence and discredit her. Fortunately, we hold expert medical reports proving that there was nothing wrong with her.
In an effort to discover what progress had been made, as no written notification had been received, Anne and Hollie visited MSP Brian Adam, which led to his letter to Mrs Angiolini of 27th October 2000 to ask what progress had been made. Anne Greig made the scale of the abuse absolutely clear to Mr Adam, along with the information that there were now at least three victims. Therefore, to expect anyone to believe that Mrs Angiolini was unaware of the depth of the allegations and the number of those involved, as well as the plight of the Macdonald children is to suspend all credibility.
Furthermore, Mr Adam then referred Anne and Hollie to another MSP, Richard Lochhead, who was also informed of all the terrible details and undertook to find out more from the Procurator Fiscal. If, as you claim, the case had already been dropped, albeit on a false assumption, why did Mrs Angiolini fail to inform the two MSPs accordingly. Anne Greig was certainly not informed.
I note that around this time, Mrs Angiolini was no stranger to controversy over her failure to deal effectively with paedophile rapists. A report of 25th May 2001, commented on, I believe, the chaotic conditions of her office that had allowed a twenty-two-year-old man , who had actually admitted raping a ten-year-old girl, to walk free. Mrs Angiolini was forced to accept responsibility for this atrocious debacle.
If one adds this case to the sixteen named attackers of Hollie and the other children, we find that within Mrs Angiolini`s first year in office, no fewer than seventeen serial paedophile sex abusers were allowed to continue their horrifying crimes, secure in the knowledge of the tacit protection of the Regional Procurator Fiscal.
A more lamentable record would be surely difficult to find.
One of the most sickening current aspects of all this, is that Mrs Angiolini has been suddenly galvanised into action when it comes to saving her own skin. This contrasts starkly with her inaction when defenceless children were being repeatedly violated in the area for which she bore responsibility.
Finally, you state that the Lord Advocate has a long-standing commitment in bringing to justice those who commit sexual crimes. I feel sure that you will concede that this is totally inconsistent with her past conduct and thus, her position is untenable.
In the interests of the people of Scotland, she should go and go now.
Yours faithfully,
Robert GREEN.
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse, it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
Thursday, November 19, 2009 ‘The Firm’ censored, now apologise over Lord Advocate 'allegations' in Hollie Greig abuse scandal as Police investigate Aberdeen Paedophile ring
Victims of abuse :
Hollie Greig and her mother, Anne.
LEGAL THREATS against newspapers and online media over the reporting of allegations of serious & prolonged abuse dating back over a decade, made by former Aberdeen resident Hollie Greig against senior legal figures allegedly involved in a Paedophile ring based in Aberdeen, yesterday, resulted in online investigations & reports into the scandal being pulled after intervention from the most senior levels of Scotland's legal establishment.
Scots legal publication "The Firm" was forced to drop abuse report involving big name legal figure The allegations, made by Down's Syndrome sufferer Hollie Greig against several identified individuals, which, according to Aberdeen's Press & Journal newspaper include a Sheriff & senior Police Officer, also identified a big name in Scotland's legal establishment who is alleged to have been involved in the investigation, but who now cannot be identified for legal reasons due to a clamp placed on reporting the story by Scotland's Crown Office.
Our earlier coverage of the abuse story is below : Down’s syndrome victim identifies Sheriff & Police in Aberdeen Paedophile ring as Grampian Police investigate claims of historical abuse
and Hollie’s story, can be read here : http://stolenkids-hollie.blogspot.com/
Grampian Police are said to have interviewed Hollie Greig during September of this year as they pursued their investigation, although it transpires from media reports still available that Hollie and her mother claim to have made a statement at Bucksburn police station in July 2000 naming a senior police officer, who has since died, and a Sheriff who is still serving on the bench.
Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill refused to comment on Hollie Greig's case. While supporters & friends of Hollie's family have sent out pleas for help to many of Holyrood's MSPs, including Brian Adam who, documents now reveal was involved in assisting Hollie & her mother while they lived in Aberdeen, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill refused to make any comment on the case, instead referring media interest to Scotland's Crown Office. When enquiries were made of the Crown Office for their reaction to the abuse allegations and certain details, the Crown Office issued a release which contained a threat of defamation proceedings against anyone who quoted two reports published on 17 November in one of Scotland’s legal publications, “The Firm” magazine.
Today, “The Firm” retract their allegations against the Lord Advocate. In a breaking development today, “The Firm” have printed a full retraction of their claims, apologising to Scotland’s Lord Advocate, Elish Angiolini. The Firm’s editor Steven Raeburn said:. “The firm never believed that the Lord Advocate acted in any way improperly in this matter, which is of significant public interest and was reported by us in good faith “However, there were details relating to the timeline of the decision not to prosecute the alleged abusers that were unclear, which we believed required explanation that was not immediately forthcoming from the Crown Office. “We have now been furnished with that information and accept unreservedly that she had no involvement with this matter – and apologise if she believed we were suggesting otherwise.”
Now, one might think this sudden secrecy on alleged sex offenders and paedophiles in Scotland seems a bit out of place, considering over the past few days we have seen yesterday’s big announcement by Central Scotland Police they had collected up to 2000 email addresses in an investigation into online predators targeting children for abuse and a recent statement by Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill in the Scottish Parliament on sex offenders
Kenny MacAskill’s statement on Sex Offenders to Parliament, so far nothing on Hollie Greig …
Down’s syndrome victim identifies Sheriff & Police in Aberdeen Paedophile ring as Grampian Police investigate claims of historical abuse
BIG NAMES in Scottish legal circles have been identified as alleged abusers by a down’s syndrome woman who claims she was abused as a child by a paedophile ring based in Aberdeen which, according to the Press & Journal newspaper includes a named Sheriff and a senior Police Officer.
Grampian Police have so far not given a full Press Release on the case, despite being pressed for reaction, and there are rumours the Crown Office has issued guidelines to newspaper editors on what cannot be published about the case, which all starkly contrasts with yesterday’s big announcement by Central Scotland Police they had collected up to 2000 email addresses in an investigation into online predators targeting children for abuse and a recent statement by Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill in the Scottish Parliament on sex offenders which you can watch on video, HERE
So .. silence on some cases of abuse which include allegations against members of the judiciary & law enforcement services, but big public announcements on others … now there’s got to be something wrong with that policy ….
The Press & Journal report :
DOWN'S SYNDROME WOMAN NAMES PAEDOPHILE RING
Hollie tells police she was abused by sheriff
Published: 18/11/2009
Grampian Police have reinterviewed a disabled woman who claims she was abused as a child by an Aberdeen paedo-phile ring which included a senior police officer and a leading Scottish sheriff.
Hollie Greig, 29, who has Down’s Syndrome, claims she was abused for 14 years from the age of six, and has given police the names of some of the men she says assaulted her.
Hollie and her mother, Anne, have been campaigning since 2000 when police were first informed of the alleged abuse, for criminal proceedings to be taken against those she says were involved.
The abuse is alleged to have taken place in Aberdeen, and Hollie and her mother claim to have made a statement at Bucksburn police station in July 2000 naming a senior police officer, who has since died, and a sheriff who still serves.
The Press and Journal knows the identities of both men but has decided not to make them public at this stage.
No charges have ever been brought, although Hollie received £13,500 compensation from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in April this year.
It is understood that followed evidence from a Grampian detective inspector who described Hollie as “a truthful witness to the best of her ability and an entirely innocent victim”.
Last night, Mrs Greig, 58, said her daughter has had nightmares and suffered panic attacks since she first told her mother about the alleged abuse nine years ago.
“We’ve been battling this for a long time now and we are angry with the way things were handled right from the start,” she said.
“We were practically forced out of our home in Aberdeen and fled to Shropshire when this whole thing came to light. During these past nine years myself and Hollie have been called liars and had to put up with constant insults but we will continue to fight despite the endless brick walls we hit.”
Mrs Greig said she ordered two psychological reports on Hollie to dismiss claims she had invented the allegations.
“Hollie was asked to draw pictures and describe sexual acts to see if there was any signs she might be lying.
“Both reports, carried out by two separate doctors, came back saying that 100% she was telling the truth and had been sexually abused.”
Mrs Greig said Hollie’s campaign would continue until justice has been done. “All Hollie wants is justice. She says this has ruined her childhood. She doesn’t trust anyone and I’m the only person she can be around for any length of time.”
Mrs Greig said two officers from Grampian Police visited Hollie in September and spent three-and-a-half hours interviewing her at a special facility in Shrewsbury.
Hollie and her mother, who moved to Shropshire to escape the alleged abuse, have enlisted a group of high-profile supporters, including, it is understood, singer Annie Lennox, to support their demand for a prosecution.
Mrs Greig claims that two of the alleged abusers moved to Portugal a number of years ago and that she went to her local police station in Shrewsbury to pass on that information when news broke of the kidnapping of Madeleine McCann.
Madeleine, who was three at the time, was kidnapped from her family’s holiday apartment at Praia da Luz, in the Algarve, in 2006. Police believe she was taken by a paedophile.
One of Hollie’s supporters wrote to the Crown Office in Edinburgh earlier this year querying the decision not to prosecute and received a reply from Andrew McIntyre, Head of Victims and Diversity, setting out the criteria for determining whether to bring charges.
His reply suggested that, in Hollie’s case, the decision was based on the lack of independent corroboration. Mr McIntyre gave an assurance that police were continuing to investigate “aspects of the case” and said that the ongoing inquiries prevented him from commenting further.
Grampian Police last night confirmed the force was investigating an allegation of historic sex abuse.
A Crown Office spokes-woman said late last night: "We have not received any report from the police.
“If we do receive a report it will be carefully considered in due course."
'Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable - expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name! No child asked to be or enjoys abuse,
it is for the gratification of the inadequate'.
